Luke Livingstone

[Johnson#26]

Should we have a look at him? Pick number 4 in the 2000 draft (albeit a shallow one) and has shown a bit at times. I think Pagan's patiance has run out with him.

[Nath]

Yeah, lets look at Hulme, Angwin and Franchina in a package deal

[Johnson#26]

Seriously, pick 4 means he has done something right. Should we look at him?

Speaking of defenders, David Schwartz wrote in his Inside Football collum that Chris Lamb from the Dees is a talent and should be looked at.

[3rd degree]

If Lamb is any good he'd getting a game in melbourne's back line, Schwartz was a nickboker wearing try hard tough guy.

[Nath]

Livingstone may have gone at pick 4 but he aint worth crap on the market. The guy is not a defneder, can't kick for a forward and if he was any chop, much like Lamb (no pun intended) he'd be getting a game in a Carlton backline that struggles for kpp

[Cam]

Not all top ten picks are hit songs.

[BBHS]

this guys got perenial dud written all over him

[Nath]

And our perennial dud just retired, a year without one would be nice.

[Joel]

Agreed Nath. No, stay away from him.

[Johnson#26]

What about Sam Hunt fron the Dons? He has a bit of talent, and may be on the outer with Sheeds.

[scotland is a champ!]

Livingston is actually a good player when given a chance. He played only 3 games for the blues this season but did ok. He played on Lloyd and kept him to only one goal which was surprising but then played on Tarrant and let him kick a bag Not sure whats gonna happen to him at the end of the year, but i think this guys deserves a chance.

[BBHS]

[Johnson#26]

If he went at pick 4, he must be worth something as a player. I'd have a look at him - then we coulkd *maybe* trade Presti for Jolly.