Shane Crawford

[Pants & Rowdy]

If we could get the Crawf for next too nothing Id consider him.(ie pick 23 only)

However having said this dont forget he still has two years on a heavily backloaded contract to go whick we would need to honour. No point in investing a great deal in a thirty year old player who has been succumbing to injuries recently. We need to blood midfielders for the future hence Bucks playing Half forward and Scotty burns spending time in the Forward pocket. We are not a Shane Crawford away from winning a grand final so no point in chasing him...

No way is he worth a pick 7.... Collingwoods dark old days of mismanagement and short sightedness would be coming back to haunt us again if this were to even be considered.

[Johnson#26]

No need to get Koops. He is a Docker/Dogs reject. Why get players we don't need?

[PiesFan]

koops is not even worth the time i spend typing this very sentence. Crawf is not worth trading our 1st rnd pick because he does not have that many years left in his contract.

If we get Crawf, we would need to replace Bucks, Burnsy, Crawf in the not too distant future. I can handle MCG and a late draft pick for him, not pick 7!

[Johnson#26]

But PF, the Hawks would never accept MCG and a late pick. That will never happen. It is more liekly that Didak and pcik 7 is used, but to be honest, I think he will stay put.