Nathan Brown rumour

Adz · Joined: 18 May 2003 Location: Heidelberg

Apparently he has an agreement with the Pies. It was on 3AW's breakfast thing. Who would we offload for him? Don't we need a ruckman?

JLC · Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 6:23 pm

Well Nathan Brown would be the medium sized forward that we need. At present he gets the teams best defender as he is the bulldogs most potent attacking weapon. Yet if her were at Collingwood he would get less attention as Tazza and Pebbles attract most of it. Brown can also play in midfield.

I actually thought Richmond would chase Brown as he is exactly the type of player they need to compliment Richo and Otto. Wake up Danny!!!!!

Well the Bulldogs want a marking forward so give them Molloy (Sorry Alyssa) and give them Kinnear as they want/need a backman.

jlc

maggie20ct · Joined: 31 Jul 2003 Location: Vic

we're getting brown? yay! hope its true...i really do think he will fit in really well in our team, plus he's good mates with taz they can go back to being the 'brat pack' Very Happy

the only thing is who will go if brown came, and i really have no idea but JLC i think u r on to something with kinnear, maybe even johnson?

i_luv_tarkyn! · Dream Big! Joined: 10 Aug 2002 Location: Melbourne

i would rather have soloman than brown

luv jess

GreatGonzo · Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 6:45 pm

Oh no - not again....

d9 tank · Joined: 04 Oct 2002 Location: Victoria

Never get your hopes up until the deal is done.

Molly · Joined: 25 Nov 2002 Location: Melbourne

As much as i'd love to get Brown down at Collingwood, I think we'd have to give up an absolute heap to get him. As much as i like Molloy, I'd still be wrapt if we only had to give up him and BK, but i cant see it happening that way.

Dale61 · Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 6:57 pm

For now, the answer is in the topic heading - rumour.

maggie20ct · Joined: 31 Jul 2003 Location: Vic

yeah apparantly it was in the 3AW 'romour file'....mmm not very reliable

CQ · ambitious that Joined: 25 Jul 2000 Location: melb

what a load of crap. every single year we are apparently getting every big name up for grabs.

ill believe it when it happens Rolling Eyes

Go_The_Mighty_Magpies · Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Location: Melbourne

Exactly, it is just a rumour, at one stage there was talk of us signing Darcy, but that didn't happen.

I Still think we are in greater need of a ruckman rather than another forward/ midfielder

molloymagic · Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 8:05 pm

I thought the dogs had already signed brown?. Why would they want to let him go??????????.

besides,i'm amazed on why people want certain players to be traded.

NR147 · Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: Melbourne

If we got Nathan Brown we would be the best team in the comp as it would free up so many players and himself if he were to go in the forward line. I Think we would have to trade Molloy, Scotland or maybe a draft pick

barnze23 · Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Reservoir

Hi everyone this is my first post and I have a question that eventually relates to the Nathan Brown topic, will Bucks be on the veterans list next year? and if so does this means the $500.000 a year he receives will be halved according to the salary cap, which frees up $250.000 a year to help pay the expected asking price of Brown which will be 4 to 500.000,
but as someone has already stated it's only a rumour, but another good one I heard from a very reliable source on the weekend was Nick Stevens is a huge chance to be at the pies next year.

peter_pies4ever · Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Location: Melbourne, Victoria

The rumour about Nick Stevens going to Collingwood has been around for ages.