| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Johnno75
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Location: Wantirna
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
Ralphy HS saying Pies/Dogs not in agreement over how much cash we are going to splash out for AT they want $300K we say no way. Suggests the AFL trade is unofficial.
So what happens if they don’t agree to terms?
Probably won’t happen because we will cave to demands rather than take him back.
_________________
Human behavioural studies suggest people who use a lot of swear words tend to be more honest & trustworthy. |
|
|
|
 |
5 from the wing on debut
Joined: 27 May 2016
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Johnno75 wrote: | Ralphy HS saying Pies/Dogs not in agreement over how much cash we are going to splash out for AT they want $300K we say no way. Suggests the AFL trade is unofficial.
So what happens if they don’t agree to terms?
Probably won’t happen because we will cave to demands rather than take him back. |
Assuming the AFL rules don't change this, Treloar would be paid by the Dogs in the amount of his contract with them, then if we don't pay the balance, he would sue us for it. I assume they will mediate it and resolve it along those lines, as why would the Dogs budge? |
|
|
|
|
robevpau1 
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Richard Hinds @rdhinds· Sportswriter, ABC Offsiders panelist. 19m
'Was told Pies were to pay as little as $50,000 per-season of Treloar's contract - which seemed to explain loss of picks they gained for Stephenson. Hope they at least got this right or the buck should stop somewhere...'
'Collingwood must tell members how much they are paying Treloar to play for a rival club so they can form an informed view of the competency of the administration. Otherwise, don't shame us into buying memberships or paying a premium for reserved seats.' |
|
|
|
|
scoobydoo
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| robevpau1 wrote: | Richard Hinds @rdhinds· Sportswriter, ABC Offsiders panelist. 19m
'Was told Pies were to pay as little as $50,000 per-season of Treloar's contract - which seemed to explain loss of picks they gained for Stephenson. Hope they at least got this right or the buck should stop somewhere...'
'Collingwood must tell members how much they are paying Treloar to play for a rival club so they can form an informed view of the competency of the administration. Otherwise, don't shame us into buying memberships or paying a premium for reserved seats.' |
Why do you need to be shamed to stay a member? If you don’t like what’s going on don’t renew, if you think not much will change( we’re no worse off) than renew.
The only thing Collingwood MUST do is win a flag. That’s what they owe members/supporters.
Who really gives a crap about an explanation of why they made a mistake. I’ll tell you why, coz no one’s perfect & people make mistakes. Fix it & get on with winning our next flag. |
|
|
|
|
mattdally
Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| The only ones at fault here are the Bulldogs. If we never committed to anything other than what was perceived in the media then we do not owe the dogs a single cent for his salary. |
|
|
|
|
Bucks5 
Nicky D - Parting the red sea
Joined: 23 Mar 2002
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Surely the Dogs need to prove we have agreed to contribute $300K towards his salary each year.
Unless a Collingwood rep has to co-sign the contract, then we have had no say or control of any misinformation the Bulldogs decide to put into it.
PS> I thought we were only offering $100K according to the media.
_________________
How would Siri know when to answer "Hey Siri" unless it is listening in to everything you say? |
|
|
|
|
piedys 
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Mr Miyagi wrote: | | How the fire truck does Carlton get away changing Eddie Betts to a rookie?! Same pay, but counted outside the cap. Surely this is rorting the system! |
They are always cookin' somethin' aren't they?!
It would be nice of the AwFuL to perhaps pass a change in the salary cap where perhaps one player of 10 years service to a club, could maybe be moved to rookie-list for his final season, and have that wage removed from the cap each season?
Rewards loyalty to a club, and the player involved.
But AwFuL have to terminate his contract and career once nominated, and the season concludes.
_________________
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
Boogie Knights
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^^^ My understanding of the list size changes were that they included the ability to move up to 2 players from the primary list to the rookie list and have $80k of that/those player salary excluded from the TPP.
Every club has the ability to do the same. |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Today is DFA day. Any idea if we have any in our sights to add to our list
_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
LaurieHolden 
Floreat Gymnorhina tyrannica
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Location: Victoria Park
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I thought North's DFA Mason Wood offers appeal as a utility type to fill the Macaffer / Goldsack / Sharenberg role.
While he wasn't the most reliable kick on goal, as an athlete he is a good mover and could give a side another option at either end of the ground and as a depth player.
_________________
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers |
|
|
|
|
Mr Miyagi
Joined: 14 Sep 2018
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Dark Beanie wrote: | Can we move Grundy to the Rookie list?
It would free up some cap space.. |
If Carlton can rort the system and get away with it, so should we |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man 
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| BazBoy wrote: | | Today is DFA day. Any idea if we have any in our sights to add to our list |
Nothing in Media but seen on some Footy Sites us been linked too are Majak Daw,Jordan Gallauci and Oscar McDonald
_________________
I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| LaurieHolden wrote: | I thought North's DFA Mason Wood offers appeal as a utility type to fill the Macaffer / Goldsack / Sharenberg role.
While he wasn't the most reliable kick on goal, as an athlete he is a good mover and could give a side another option at either end of the ground and as a depth player. |
I would not mind Mason Wood as a DFA
_________________
I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
dalyc
Joined: 02 Mar 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Dave The Man wrote: | | LaurieHolden wrote: | I thought North's DFA Mason Wood offers appeal as a utility type to fill the Macaffer / Goldsack / Sharenberg role.
While he wasn't the most reliable kick on goal, as an athlete he is a good mover and could give a side another option at either end of the ground and as a depth player. |
I would not mind Mason Wood as a DFA |
So you can bag him mercilessly in the future?
_________________
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better |
|
|
|
|
Mr Miyagi
Joined: 14 Sep 2018
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Boogie Knights wrote: | ^^^ My understanding of the list size changes were that they included the ability to move up to 2 players from the primary list to the rookie list and have $80k of that/those player salary excluded from the TPP.
Every club has the ability to do the same. |
It was reported it’s his entire earnings! It’s unbelievable. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
