Kennedy Sub..... AGAIN!!

[mikeyd]

not anymore

pendlebury out and Armstrong sub

[Pies4shaw]

There you are, then. You got your wish....

[MatthewBoydFanClub]

This is a total farce from a coach who is clueless. Kennedy signs a two year contract during the week which I thought would be a show of confidence from the coach and then gets picked in the 22, only to be demoted to outside the starting 21 with the inclusion of Young. If Young is outside the picked 22 to begin with, how come he comes into the starting 21 ahead of Kennedy. But this farce only becomes more farcical when Pendles breaks down and now Kennedy is brought into the starting 21. But does Kennedy start the night in the centre? No, he starts on the bench. So then what happens when Beams breaks down and is taken off? Kennedy is deemed still not good enough to start in the centre square. That privilege is reserved for Sidebottom, Swan and Macaffer. With Macaffer and Swan being thrashed at the centre bounces wouldn't you think it a better option playing Ball and Kennedy in the centre?

[King Monkey]

The boy has been one of the best in the last 2 close to full games he's played.
He's been ineffectual when coming on as sub.

"Managing workloads" I can't cop. If he's not fit enough don't play him.

[jackcass]

[King Monkey]

^Like I said, if fitness is the reasoning behind the decision to name Kennedy sub again, the alternative I offer is to not play him.
If he's fit enough to play, why was he (supposed to be) sub again??

What is your view on the situation mate??