Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Apex gang and living in fear

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mugwump 



Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne

PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 11:35 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
Mugwump wrote:
"Appalled" was just "sic"ed because, given that a similar policy has been pretty normal in Germany, the word seemed to signify the reflex moral hyperventilation that tends to surround any hard-nosed discussion of immigration. And yes, i know that some rather loathsome groups might like a "send em home" policy - but we are not talking about that. We are talking about repatriating those convicted of serious and violent crimes. It is not at all the same thing. Associating my view with the BNP and FN is rather like associating your desire for greater equality with the Khmer Rouge - the limits and conditions matter.

Finally, i dont think a "genetic, racialised view of nationality" is in question. while we were talking about Sudanese gangs in this thread, at a policy level it does not require discrimination. Whether you come to Australia from the Uk or Sudan, a period of probationary citizenship (in effect, indefinite leave to remain) through two generations would apply, and you retain your old citizenship. You want to stay and acquire full citizenship? Here's a hint - don't murder, or rob with violence, or encourage terrorism, or commit treason etc. I know it might be a little hard, pet, but if you have to be a law-breaker, stick to petty larceny and below. Some tough things would happen as such a policy played out - but probably less tough than having your skull broken by a thug with a baseball bat, or your daughter killed through gang violence.

More broadly, of course, there is the "project" of mass immigration, legal and illegal, designed by those who live on map 45 of the Melways, but mostly lived out - for now - by the citizens of Springvale and Footscray. Fortunately the long bipartisan consensus in favour of this is breaking down right across the western world as the people find their electoral voice.


I'm not sure how 'fortunate' it is given that the groups capitalising on this paradigm shift are precisely the kind of far-right parties I mentioned above. If you see that as a return to sanity, I can only presume you see those forces as less malignant than I do or at worst as a means to an end. Frankly, when I see the ceaseless public appetite for our own ever-harsher asylum seeker policies, I despair for the future of integration in the broader Western world. It seems to signify a global retreat into our own little villages and away from ideas of international cooperation and cultural exchange – an approach that makes the world far more atomised and dangerous.

I'm not saying the jury was ever out on multiculturalism. Perhaps it is a failed experiment. But this Apex stuff seems to have little to do with the strengths or weaknesses of that model; more, a failure of social policy and addressing socioeconomic inequality that can probably be solved in the medium-term without needing to resort to drastic measures. Perhaps it's a statement of the obvious that the vast majority of African youths in Australia are not running around with criminal gangs; but I'm not confident that the majority of white Australians are aware of that on any intuitive level.

We can have a reasoned debate about the costs and benefits of multiculturalism and the broader globalist economic approach, but at the end of the day, far-right political campaigns only require the same old ingredients – negative stereotypes, media hysteria and irrational fear of difference – in order to succeed. If they win, it won't be because people have seen the light; it'll be because people have embraced those dark, xenophobic aspects of human nature that we all harbour. The traits that led the Germans to slaughter the Jews, the Serbs to slaughter the Bosnians and the Hutus and Tutsis to massacre each other weren't removed from the human gene pool 20 years ago. It's so easy to hate and fear; but is it so foolish to hope that we can be better than that?


I hope it did not need clarification, but of course any rise of the far-right because of unmanaged immigration will not be fortunate - quite the opposite. My view is that the best defence against the far-right is to start taking the views of ordinary people seriously, rather than dismissing them as racist or bigoted because they value their culture, and wish to see it changed at a rate, and up to a limit, which they find comfortable. This idea - that culture matters greatly to individual and social happiness- is actually the bedrock of multiculturalism. For that reason, I think multiculturalism is / was probably a broadly humane and reasonable social objective, as long as the flow of immigrants is managed at a relatively modest level.

A community of a thousand Calithumpians in a large society is a point of positive exchange and a fine antidote to xenophobia. A million calithumpians, however, is a political force and a force for historic and social discontinuity and conflict, especially if the Calithumpians have high social distance from the host community in terms of historical experience and values. One has then to ask, to whose advantage is the transaction which has brought so many people from such different traditions into a society which was relatively settled and cohesive ?

I am sceptical of your view that most social dysfunction represents socioeconomic inequality, etc. There was great socioeconomic inequality prior to the 1960s, but few of these problems. One might consider that the breakdown of authority, the implosion of the family unit, the disintegration of common meaning brought about via immigration, the loss of religious belief, and the wrecking ball of neo-liberalism all have a far greater part to play than mere equality. And before the cheap shot brigade load their rifles, not I am not advocating a return to the 1950s, as that is neither possible nor (in many areas of social policy) desirable. However, the prissy orthodoxy of modern "progressive" multiculti liberalism seems to me at least as flawed a recipe for average human happiness as the rigidities of the 1950s, if not more so.

_________________
Two more flags before I die!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 1:12 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, that reminds me of the fourth key ingredient in right-wing political success: misplaced nostalgia. I'd strongly challenge your assertion that we had "few of these problems" 60+ years ago. On the contrary, we had muggings, burglaries, riots and organised crime like anywhere else – indeed, I wouldn't be surprised to find that these problems have actually diminished in today's society, as the overall crime rate has. But it's important to recognise that people feel things are much worse now, because that inevitably leads to the finger being pointed at the most visible sign of societal change: immigration.

On the other hand, it's not all about socioeconomics, granted. There are reasons why one impoverished teenager commits a carjacking and ten don't (including some of the reasons you list above). But socioeconomic disadvantage – and this isn't just about wages; don't forget the socio in socioeconomic – is such a substantial factor that I don't think we can tackle these problems without addressing it.

There's no one size fits all solution, and I'm sure many more experienced and knowledgeable people than me are working hard on the problem as we speak, but some immediate problems that would seem to need rectifying are 1) geography (that is, the forcing of new migrants out into far-flung suburbs), 2) job market (in which, if I recall correctly, there's something like one job for every ten unemployed people in the country), 3) housing prices (see point number one), 4) two-tiered schooling (where talented/well-off kids and teachers leave for greener pastures and the local public school becomes a ghetto), 5) lack of community (a problem that we all face in today's society, but a problem that is exacerbated for those without the tools to find new centres of meaning) and 6) for those who fall through the net, a dysfunctional criminal justice system.

Nearly all of these can be (at least partially) practically remedied by government policy or by redirecting funding. To be fair, I'm sure at least some of that work is being done right now. But there are also political forces right now actively working against those measures and entrenching poverty, inequality, uselessly punitive criminal justice paradigms and forms of de facto segregation. And the new Right have even less to offer: more scapegoating, more internecine conflict and a headlong run into the arms of fantasy economics. We can scarcely say we've done our best.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Mugwump 



Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne

PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:18 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

^ It is hard to find good data from Australia, but the Uk national statistics office (NB not Breitbart) keeps pretty good crime statistics :

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/116649/rec-crime-1898-2002.xls

Total recorded crimes against the person in 1960 : 15,759. In 2001 : 650,000.

I am sure there have been differences in reporting as well as changes in definition. Of course, more importantly, there are changes in the base population. Given the absolute numbers, however, i think the violent crime rate still clearly refutes your assertion. Of course they tally with the experience of older people who lived through both eras, too. Australia may be different, but i cannot find numbers, and i profoundly doubt it at the directional level. So, i don't think your channel-switch to "right wing nostalgia" broadcasts the "right" message. Maybe the liberal consensus has added less to aggregate human joy than the border-guards of virtuous opinion would have us believe.

I would not batter you on this, David, were it not clear to me that you are not a simple left-wing drone completely programmed against evidence and reason (though like most of us, i sense you are growing less open-minded - prone to being "appalled", if you will - as the years pass). I also agree with many of the injustices you mention such as housing prices, geographic dispersion etc. These blight the lives of new arrivals as well as the native-born young. I just wonder why we should import people who will cost us a lot of public money to settle when we have too little affordable housing, many other urgent priorities and a large, structural public deficit. The big corporations need cheap labour, a reserve pool of the unemployed and domestic consumers. Is that who really benefits ?

On the "ever more services" mantra, much poverty in the West is caused by globalisation, technology, poor education and the loss of jobs. Government has done poorly against these forces. It has expanded more or less continuously over the last fifty years and yet we continue to see great inequality, poverty and disadvantage. Our top tax rate is nearly 50% and it cuts in fairly early in the income scale. We have a large deficit. Maybe, on the evidence, more taxes, more borrowing and more money for government workers are not the answer (unless, of course, one is a state sector worker).

Maybe it is time to be a bit more genuinely radical. It seems to me that the liberal consensus (including neo-liberalism) has been too happy with status quo ideas for too long. And no, Trumpery is of course not the solution.

_________________
Two more flags before I die!


Last edited by Mugwump on Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:48 am; edited 5 times in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:24 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

It is about that time now.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Skids Cancer

Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175

PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 7:46 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

African Violence Intensifies in Melbourne

http://newobserveronline.com/african-violence-intensifies-melbourne/

The ongoing Third World mass invasion of Australia has caused yet another sharp spike in African gang violence in Melbourne, with car vandalism, stabbings, robberies, and assaults reaching a new high in December.

Figures released by the Crime Statistics Agency Victoria show that offenders under the age of 25 are committing more and more crimes.

None of these figures and statistics dared mention the race of the offenders, and the Australian—typically—went out of its way to pretend that the crime wave was being committed by a “united nations” of offenders.

However, the reality is obvious from arrest records, photographs of gang members in court, and the police’s own wanted notices.

<moved from terrorism thread>

_________________
Don't count the days, make the days count.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:03 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Was it ISIS or a Sudanese gang, Stui?

Edit: Also moved from the terrorism thread - Allah alone knows why.


Last edited by Pies4shaw on Fri Dec 30, 2016 10:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:14 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^

Dunno. I dare say neither are very good at rain dances.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:16 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

My brother's car was vandalised (broken windows) the other night along with other parked cars on the same street. Thankfully, my car was parked in the garage so I avoided the brunt of it.

Police knocked on our front door first thing in the morning to ask whether we witnessed or heard anything in overnight, but we didn't hear anything during the night, but I suspect it was a gang of some sort that was behind the attack.

Apparently, they were also specifically targeting Audis for whatever reason, but my brother doesn't drive an Audi though. It It could relate to a car re-birthing racket or something to that extent.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |


Last edited by Jezza on Sat Dec 31, 2016 4:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:50 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

^ Might want to fix the quote above, Jezza! Pretty sure that passage was written by a Neo-Nazi, not Skids.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:56 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Ad hominem abuse, David? Wink
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 12:10 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

No, they're, like, actual Neo-Nazis. The site is full of anti-Jewish stuff and pro-Hitler puff-pieces besides the usual alt-right rabble-rousing.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 2:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
No, they're, like, actual Neo-Nazis. The site is full of anti-Jewish stuff and pro-Hitler puff-pieces besides the usual alt-right rabble-rousing.

Yes, I know. Hence the"wink". I was recalling a post a few days back when I was accused of the same thing for calling neo-Nazis - Allah forbid - "neo-Nazis".
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 6:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^

ISIS have a lot in common with the Nazis, how the Matrix comes into this I'm not sure.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 10:13 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^ That's more of an alt-left thing (that and V for Vendetta).
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group