| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bwphantom 
It's Better to Burn Out Than to Fade Away
Joined: 15 Mar 2002
Location: Brisbane QLD
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
H and our 3rd for Watts and their 3rd.
_________________
All this may be summed up in one word - CHARACTER - and if that is not worth developing, nothing is.
Jock McHale |
|
|
|
 |
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Hate to be a party pooper but there is a chance Melbourne might have to use pick 22 to secure father son player Stretch.
That would be a major blow because if they offer up pick 22 for H we should accept it then run like buggery.
Potentially we could end up with picks 4, 8, 22, 24 and 28.
Hine can work some magic with that.
_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
jackcass 
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| themonk wrote: | | jackcass wrote: | | Lazza wrote: | | watt price tully wrote: | | Lazza wrote: | | watt price tully wrote: | | I've got the feeling it will be H for Clarke & a round 3 swap of picks to favour us. |
I thought that Geelong were now the favourites to get Clarke??  |
There's no favourite atm. My speculation is based on Melbourne having a say & we have H, H wants to go to Melbourne, Melbourne wants H.
That being said Geelong may offer Melbourne more than us. |
Oh well FWIW, Geeling got Clarke so it is a moot point now......  |
Nothing is done and dusted until paperwork lodged at the AFL during the trade period. |
Really? how will Geelong ever come up with a 2nd or 3rd round pick |
Not saying they don't have the capacity, just that nothing is certain until paperwork is lodged, particularly with a player of Clark's history. |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| swoop42 wrote: | Hate to be a party pooper but there is a chance Melbourne might have to use pick 22 to secure father son player Stretch.
That would be a major blow because if they offer up pick 22 for H we should accept it then run like buggery.
Potentially we could end up with picks 4, 8, 22, 24 and 28.
Hine can work some magic with that. |
F/S would lock up their pick so could be a problem if it's pick 2 for Stretch. End of 1st round pick compo for Frawley would work equally well. |
|
|
|
|
boom
Joined: 02 Jun 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| We won't get 22 for H, we'll be offered whatever Geelong give up for Clark. Probably their second rounder, 33 or so. |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Then we reject it.
If they can give 23 for Vince then Collingwood will demand 22 for H.
_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
boom
Joined: 02 Jun 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Can we? Adelaide were desperate to get into the draft following the Tippett sanctions... and if a deal didn't get done Vince would have stayed at Adelaide without issue. There is no way Harry is staying. Don't get me wrong I'd love 22, but we'll be offered what they get from the Cats. |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| H is still contracted isn't he |
|
|
|
|
Harvey
Joined: 15 Oct 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Think it will end up being something like H + 28 to Melb for 22 +33. Essentially equates to a mid second round pick. |
|
|
|
|
woftam 
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Harvey wrote: | | Think it will end up being something like H + 28 to Melb for 22 +33. Essentially equates to a mid second round pick. |
Not a bad outcome really. |
|
|
|
|
Podpicken
Joined: 28 Oct 2006
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| woftam wrote: | | Harvey wrote: | | Think it will end up being something like H + 28 to Melb for 22 +33. Essentially equates to a mid second round pick. |
Not a bad outcome really. |
I'd take that.
_________________
Billy Picken, the great No. 25 in the sky! |
|
|
|
|
thompsoc
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Take pick 22 and ruuuuunnnnnn!
It is a good deal!
_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest. |
|
|
|
|
Rick 
Joined: 11 May 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I've heard a lot from Hine about our age profile 22-25. I wonder if a straight swap for Tapscott could be considered. |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Tough to even speculate until the F/S and FA stuff gets sorted. An exchange of 2nd round picks and their 3rd round pick wouldn't be to bad. What compo they get for Frawley will influence their preparedness to look at that though, as will what they get for Clark. Will the Dees F/S Stretch, what will he cost, will they have to commit their 2nd round pick? And what happens if Moore miraculously slips to our 2nd round pick and we no longer have that available. |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18
|
| Post subject: | |
|
If Moore slips to our second rounder they can literally have H for some steak knives.
It must be a pack of 6 though.
LOL.
_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
