| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Joel 
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
| Post subject: Kruezer - Did anyone else hear Jay Clark on SEN? |  |
|
I'm pretty sure Jay Clark said he has heard we are into him. Just another rumour. But, wanted to make sure I wasn't hearing things.
Not sure he's what we need. He's always injured. A talent for sure, but he is hardly on the park. Not sure of his contract status. |
|
|
|
 |
Dave The Man 
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Tony Shaw Started that
_________________
I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
slangman
Joined: 11 Aug 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Great way to increase your injury list before 2015 had even come around
_________________
- Side By Side - |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Given we're going after Clark, there's no way we'd be after another ruckman, especially with Witts, Grundy, White and Cox on our list. |
|
|
|
|
Joel
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Here is confirmation that I did hear right:
http://www.sen.com.au/display-article-2013/Collingwood-interested-in-Kreuzer/71490
| Quote: | Carlton ruckman Matthew Kreuzer has attracted the interest of a number of clubs in recent days, most notably that of Collingwood.
“There’s been a bit of a whisper going around the last few days that there’s been some clubs interested in Kreuzer,” Brett Anderson told the Morning Glory.
“Collingwood being one who have at least enquired about Kreuzer’s availability.”
The ruckman has had an injury-riddled past five seasons, most notably a ruptured ACL during the 2010 season.
Kreuzer’s contract is set to expire at the end of the 2015 season, so Carlton may look to receive something in return rather than risk losing the former number one pick for nothing.
The news also poses questions for Collingwood’s forward-line and ruck plans for next season given the club currently has young rucks Brodie Grundy and Jarrod Witts on its list, as well as a public interest in Melbourne forward-ruck Mitch Clark.
Jesse White’s future at the Pies may also be called into question. |
|
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I wonder if White might be traded to the Dees for Clark? |
|
|
|
|
woftam 
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I wouldn't take too much notice of Jay Clark. Comes up with a new rumour every day. With Witts & Grundy developing nicely, we don't need another ruck taking games off them. If anything we just require a back up ruckman in case of injury. |
|
|
|
|
swoop42 
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Perhaps the pies are playing funny buggers with the scum with the implied threat of you bid on Moore and we'll look to take Kruezer next season when F/A kicks in for him.
He was a Collingwood supporter as a kid I believe.
_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
melliot
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Kruezer is a 1st ruck. Not a key forward.
Don't understand with Witts and Grundy why we would entertain another ruck. He will be too expensive to have as just a back up. And Witts and Grundy need the exposure to senior footy.
Considering Wood was getting a game ahead of Warnock, I don't understand why they'd trade their best ruck away. Even after trading Hansen the year before.
Makes no sense to me. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| melliot wrote: | Kruezer is a 1st ruck. Not a key forward.
Don't understand with Witts and Grundy why we would entertain another ruck. He will be too expensive to have as just a back up. And Witts and Grundy need the exposure to senior footy.
Considering Wood was getting a game ahead of Warnock, I don't understand why they'd trade their best ruck away. Even after trading Hansen the year before.
Makes no sense to me. |
The rumor was probably started by his manager, trying to up his price. |
|
|
|
|
Albert Parker
Joined: 13 Dec 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| swoop42 wrote: | Perhaps the pies are playing funny buggers with the scum with the implied threat of you bid on Moore and we'll look to take Kruezer next season when F/A kicks in for him.
He was a Collingwood supporter as a kid I believe. |
Yes and yes
_________________
One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership |
|
|
|
|
Bruce Gonsalves
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Dave The Man wrote: | | Tony Shaw Started that |
Tony Shaw and Kruizers old man go way back. |
|
|
|
|
Breadcrawl
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| swoop42 wrote: | Perhaps the pies are playing funny buggers with the scum with the implied threat of you bid on Moore and we'll look to take Kruezer next season when F/A kicks in for him.
He was a Collingwood supporter as a kid I believe. |
Awesome theory.
As long as we don't actually get him
_________________
they can smell what we're cookin' |
|
|
|
|
Deja Vu
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
has been dismissed as rubbish. it is the silly season after all.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
